The extradition[1] expedition.
Basically, you’re Shantaram.[2] Fleeing a country where you’re an alleged or committed criminal. And hiding out in (in his case) India[3]. But you’re living on the low down and dodging the police at all costs, because they’ll send you back to that country where you will have to face what you did/ did not do.
If you aren’t much of a reader, then that analogy was pretty pointless. So take Shrien Dewani’s[4] case. In March, the England courts[5] found him mentally unstable and therefore ruled that it would be unjust to extradite him here to stand trial. He returns to these English courts today,[6] so we’ll see what they have to say now.
So that’s what extradition’s all about.
Here’s what it’s like in South Africa:
We have a glittery Constitution that we’re all proud of. We dote over it. We look down on other countries’ constitutions. And we take it very seriously.
And in it is the just-as-glittery Bill of Rights, which protects, among others is the right to life.[7] The Constitution goes on to say that everything must promote the ‘spirit purport and object of the Bill of Rights’.[8]
So what do we do when someone, an alleged murder from Botswana let’s say, is wanted for their crime, and the death penalty is a possible outcome of their trial? Does South Africa protect their right to life and say that they cannot be extradited if it will directly result in their death? Or does South Africa let other countries follow their laws, we follow ours and everyone’s happy?
Turns out, we respect the right to life. In this case, ‘a Botswana national wanted for murder may not be extradited unless that country gives the assurances that he would not face the death penalty’.[9]
Judge Edwin Cameron[10] ruled that it would be a breach of our statutory values to send him off to be killed. Because of what they decided, the country (in this case Botswana) must make an agreement with South Africa that he will not face the death penalty, and then he can be extradited.
Constitutionally, that sounds pretty logical. Practically? I’m not sure. If I were a convicted criminal fleeing a possible death penalty, South Africa would now become my choice destination.
What do you think?
[1] ‘The transfer of an accused from one state or country to another state or country that seeks to place the accused on trial.’ Legal Dictionary, viewed on 31 July 2012 at http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/extradition.
[2]Gregory David Roberts, Shantaram, http://www.shantaram.com/.
[3] For India’s position on extradition, http://cbi.nic.in/interpol/extradition.php
[4] Who allegedly arranging the killing of his wife, Anni, when they were honeymooning in South Africa in 2010.
[5] Or, more specifically, The Royal Courts of Justice.
[6] Dube Dudu, The New Age, ‘Dewani Has Day In Court’, viewed on 31 July at http://www.thenewage.co.za/57620-1007-53-Dewani_has_day_in_court.
[7] Constitution, s 11, viewed at https://voetnotes.wordpress.com/sources/.
[8] Ibid at S 39 (2).
[9] Jenni Evans, IOL, ConCourt Rules on Botswana Extradition viewed on 31 July at http://www.iol.co.za/news/africa/concourt-rules-on-botswana-extradition-1.1350953#.UBeHkReOC-p.
[10] He’s that cool Constitutional Court judge who announced that he was gay and living with HIV when he was applying to be a ConCourt judge.